Working paperNot peer-reviewed

ContentIQ working paperCIQ-WP-2026-24CategoryVersion 11 Oct 2026

What sells in Textiles & Soft Furnishings on TikTok Shop: higher-priced products, voice-over videos and a growing category

263 videos tracked, 174 analysed in depth, 100 top-selling products, 1 category, 2 Sept–1 Oct 2026

MediaLabs Research · in collaboration with Coherence Limited

Scope
Category
Data
2 Sep – 1 Oct 2026
Sample
263 videos · 174 watched · 100 products · 1 category
+37%: category revenue, latest 4 weeks against the previous 4 (13 weeks: -7.1%, market -11.1%)

Key findings

  1. 01+37%category revenue, latest 4 weeks against the previous 4 (13 weeks: -7.1%, market -11.1%)
  2. 0278.2%of category revenue credited to affiliate creators; 67.3% sold through shoppable video
  3. 03$59revenue-weighted median price of top-selling products; the $60–100 band earns 1.67× the average product
  4. 041.3×sales per view for voice-over B-roll videos (90% range 1.07–1.54)
  5. 051.5×sales per view for price or deal hooks (90% range 1.09–1.94), medium confidence, 11 videos
  6. 060.64AUC of the model separating top-selling videos (90% range 0.57–0.70): modest
Contents
  1. Abstract
  2. 1.Introduction
  3. 2.Data
  4. 3.Methods
  5. 4.Results: momentum, channels and season
  6. 5.Results: prices, commission, product age and competition
  7. 6.Results: hooks, formats and production
  8. 7.Discussion
  9. 8.Conclusion
  10. Methodology
  11. Limitations
  12. References
  13. Cite as

Abstract

We analysed Textiles & Soft Furnishings on TikTok Shop over 2 September to 1 October 2026. Category revenue in the latest 4 weeks was 37% above the previous 4, though the 13-week comparison is still down 7.1%, better than the market's 11.1% fall. Top-selling products cluster around a revenue-weighted median price of $59, and products in the $60–100 band earn 1.67× the average product. Voice-over B-roll videos sell at 1.3× the market's sales per view (90% range 1.07–1.54), but most other hook and format estimates rest on small groups and have wide ranges.

1. Introduction

Brands and creators in home textiles face two linked questions on TikTok Shop: which products are worth selling, and which kinds of video sell them. Answers are scarce for a single category, because most public work studies popularity in general rather than sales. Short-video popularity research shows that attention is long-tailed and that early popularity predicts later popularity [1]. Recent prediction benchmarks find that creator features matter most and that content features add comparatively little [2, 3]. Live-stream selling is linked to trust and engagement in social commerce [4], and affiliate commission is a deliberate lever whose level varies by seller [5].

This paper describes what sells in Textiles & Soft Furnishings: the category's momentum, sales channels, prices, commission, competition and seasonality, and the hooks, formats and production styles associated with higher sales per view. All findings are associations in observational data, not effects.

2. Data

Our analysis covers 263 videos tracked in the category between 2 September and 1 October 2026. Of these, 174 were watched and analysed in depth by our AI analyst, which recorded the hook, format and production style. The market baseline for video comparisons draws on 3,342 analysed videos across all categories.

Marketplace figures (prices, commission, product age, competition) rest on 100 top-selling products in the category. Channel, momentum and competition figures are as of 29 September 2026; price and commission figures are as of 1 October 2026. Groups with few videos are flagged as low confidence throughout.

Daily rankings of top-selling TikTok Shop videos in the US were collected from several independent sources and merged into one record per video. Where sources overlap, their sales estimates are cross-checked against each other, and videos whose estimates disagree by more than half are flagged. An AI analyst watched each video and recorded its opening, format, angle, production style, use of AI, hook source, length, pacing and what appears in the first second, without seeing how the video sold. Sales per view is a video group’s revenue per view divided by the market’s, shrunk toward the average for small groups, with 90% ranges. Weekly category figures for the US (estimated revenue, its split between video, LIVE and the shop tab, affiliate revenue, shops and active products, and a year of weekly revenue) and daily rankings of each category’s top-selling products (unit price, commission rate, launch date and revenue by channel) were collected from several independent sources. Medians of price and commission are weighted by revenue; momentum compares the latest weeks with the same number of weeks before. This paper covers 2026-09-02 to 2026-10-01: 263 videos tracked in Textiles & Soft Furnishings, 174 of them watched and analysed; the market baseline uses all 3,342 watched videos; 100 top-selling products in Textiles & Soft Furnishings. Predictions come from a logistic model retrained daily and tested on recent weeks it had not seen.

3. Methods

Sales per view is a group of videos' revenue per view divided by the market's, so 1 is the market average. Small groups are shrunk toward the average by empirical Bayes [6], and we report 90% intervals on the log scale. Momentum compares the category's estimated revenue in the latest 4 and 13 weeks with the same number of weeks before. Shares are of all categories tracked.

Channels split the latest week's revenue into shoppable video, LIVE and the shop tab, plus the share credited to affiliate creators. Prices, commission and product age use the top-selling products; medians and ranges are revenue-weighted, and revenue per product by band is compared with the average product. Competition counts shops and active products and measures concentration as the top ten products' share and the Herfindahl–Hirschman index [7]. Seasonality compares each month with the category's average month over the past year, leaving out partial months; separating season from trend follows [8].

The predictive model is a logistic model of top-selling videos, retrained daily and tested on recent weeks it had not seen. Performance is reported as AUC [9] with a bootstrap range [10].

4. Results: momentum, channels and season

Textiles & Soft Furnishings ranked 16th of 28 categories by revenue, with 2.1% of market revenue in the latest 4 weeks. Revenue in those 4 weeks was 37% above the previous 4. Over 13 weeks it was 7.1% below the previous 13, against an 11.1% fall for the market as a whole, so the category is holding up better than the market after a soft summer.

In the latest week, 67.3% of category revenue came through shoppable video, 17.2% through LIVE and 15.4% through the shop tab, against 64.9%, 17.1% and 18% for the market. Affiliate creators were credited with 78.2% of category revenue, so the category leans slightly more on video than the market does.

Monthly revenue has varied around a normal month: 1.24× in June and 1.21× in March, but 0.77× in January and 0.87× in August. November and December were each about 1.07–1.08× last year. Halloween is under way, Black Friday / Cyber Monday starts in 40 days and holiday gifting in 45. Seasonal indices rest on a single year, so they are indicative only.

Textiles & Soft Furnishings: revenue per week, last six months
Figure 1. Textiles & Soft Furnishings: revenue per week, last six months

5. Results: prices, commission, product age and competition

The revenue-weighted median price among top-selling products is $59, and the middle half of products sit between $34 and $95. Revenue per product rises with price: products under $10 (3 products) and at $10–20 (14 products) earn 0.46× and 0.5× the average product, while the $60–100 band (17 products) earns 1.67× and holds 28.3% of top-product revenue. The $100-and-over band (10 products) earns 1.11×. The $35–60 band is the largest by count (30 products) and earns 1.04×.

The revenue-weighted median affiliate commission is 10%. Products paying 10–15% commission (35 products) account for 48.5% of revenue at 1.1× the average product, and 5–10% (33 products) for 43%. The 15–20% band has 6 products at 0.47×, and the single product at 20–30% is too few to read. Video carried 86.3% of revenue in the 5–10% band and 83.3% in the 10–15% band.

Products launched in the last 90 days produced 20.7% of top-product revenue. Products aged 1–2 years (33 products) produced 40.5% at 1.23× the average, while those over 2 years earned 0.56×. The category has 4,461 shops and 25,045 active products. Average revenue per shop is $2,224, against $2,401 for the median category. The top ten products take 43.3% of top-product revenue, and the HHI among tracked top products is 346, which indicates low concentration.

Textiles & Soft Furnishings: revenue per product by price band (1 = the average product)
Figure 2. Textiles & Soft Furnishings: revenue per product by price band (1 = the average product)

6. Results: hooks, formats and production

Voice-over B-roll is the clearest format result: 42 videos and 29.4% of watched-video sales, at 1.28× the market's sales per view (90% range 1.07–1.54, high confidence). Demo or tutorial videos are similarly numerous (40 videos, 24.3% of sales) but sell at 0.83× (0.69–1.00). Unboxing (1.34×, 6 videos) and review or testimonial (1.18×, 15 videos) are above average, but their ranges include 1 and the unboxing group is low confidence.

Among hooks, price or deal leads at 1.45× (1.09–1.94, 11 videos, medium confidence). Relatable POV is the largest group (39 videos, 22.7% of sales) and sells at 0.94× (0.77–1.13, high confidence), meaning it is common but not distinctive. Trend or sound hooks sit at 0.78× (0.58–1.04, 10 videos). Filmed live action sells at 1.05× (0.93–1.18) and photo slideshows at 0.77× (0.59–1.00, 14 videos).

The predictive model reaches an AUC of 0.64 (90% range 0.57–0.70), trained on 2,667 rows, and was not restricted to analyses that never saw sales (cleanOnly is false). Its strongest positive drivers include filmed live action (odds ratio 2.54) and no visible AI (1.71). Overall the model ranks top-selling videos only modestly better than chance.

Sales per view by format, against the market (1 = average)
Figure 3. Sales per view by format, against the market (1 = average)

7. Discussion

For brands, the evidence points to mid- to higher-priced textiles, especially the $60–100 band, where revenue per product is highest among the bands. Very low-priced items earn about half the average product. Commission of 5–15% covers over 90% of revenue; higher rates are not associated with better revenue per product here. Competition is spread across many shops, with low concentration, so no single product dominates.

For creators, voice-over B-roll and price-led hooks are associated with higher sales per view, while trend-led hooks and demos sell below average. This fits the pattern in prior work that creator and distribution factors weigh heavily relative to content features [2], which is consistent with the model's modest AUC. Voice-over B-roll may reflect product type, shop, ad support or creator audience rather than the format itself. Advertising effects are also hard to isolate from observational data [11].

The 4-week rise coincides with the start of the autumn season and Halloween, and the 13-week decline shows that the recovery is recent. Seasonal indices cover one year, so timing for Black Friday and holiday gifting should be treated as a hypothesis.

8. Conclusion

Textiles & Soft Furnishings is a mid-ranked category (16th of 28) that is recovering, with revenue up 37% over the latest 4 weeks. Sales are video- and affiliate-led, and top-selling products cluster around $59, with the $60–100 band performing best per product. Voice-over B-roll and price-led hooks are associated with higher sales per view, but several estimates have wide ranges and small samples.

These findings describe associations in a 30-day window and should be re-tested as the holiday period unfolds.

Methodology

Daily rankings of top-selling TikTok Shop videos in the US were collected from several independent sources and merged into one record per video. Where sources overlap, their sales estimates are cross-checked against each other, and videos whose estimates disagree by more than half are flagged. An AI analyst watched each video and recorded its opening, format, angle, production style, use of AI, hook source, length, pacing and what appears in the first second, without seeing how the video sold. Sales per view is a video group’s revenue per view divided by the market’s, shrunk toward the average for small groups, with 90% ranges. Weekly category figures for the US (estimated revenue, its split between video, LIVE and the shop tab, affiliate revenue, shops and active products, and a year of weekly revenue) and daily rankings of each category’s top-selling products (unit price, commission rate, launch date and revenue by channel) were collected from several independent sources. Medians of price and commission are weighted by revenue; momentum compares the latest weeks with the same number of weeks before. This paper covers 2026-09-02 to 2026-10-01: 263 videos tracked in Textiles & Soft Furnishings, 174 of them watched and analysed; the market baseline uses all 3,342 watched videos; 100 top-selling products in Textiles & Soft Furnishings. Predictions come from a logistic model retrained daily and tested on recent weeks it had not seen.

Limitations

Most videos in the sample are top-ranked, so findings mostly separate strong sellers from good ones rather than from all videos; typical and weak videos are being added. Product figures cover the top-selling products we track in each category, not every listing, so they describe what sells best rather than everything on sale. Results are associations, not causes. Paid promotion, creator audience size and product price are not fully controlled for. Revenue, views and sales are estimates, not figures reported by TikTok. The window is 30 days and covers one category, so seasonal readings use a single year. Many hook and format groups have fewer than 20 videos and are marked low or medium confidence. The model was not trained only on analyses that never saw sales, and its AUC is modest. Price, commission and age figures rest on 100 top-selling products and exclude the long tail of smaller sellers [brynjolfsson2003]. Sales per view is an association and does not account for ad spend, creator audience or product differences.

References

  1. [1]Szabo, G., & Huberman, B. A. (2010). Predicting the popularity of online content. Communications of the ACM, 53(8), 80–88. cacm.acm.org/research/predicting-the-popularity-of-online-content
  2. [2]Ye, L., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., et al. (2025). MVP: Winning solution to SMP Challenge 2025 video track. arXiv:2507.00950. arxiv.org/abs/2507.00950
  3. [3]Lu, J., Wang, W., Xiao, M., et al. (2024). M3TR: Temporal retrieval enhanced multi-modal micro-video popularity prediction. arXiv:2411.15455. arxiv.org/abs/2411.15455
  4. [4]Wongkitrungrueng, A., & Assarut, N. (2020). The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of Business Research, 117, 543–556.
  5. [5]Libai, B., Biyalogorsky, E., & Gerstner, E. (2003). Setting referral fees in affiliate marketing. Journal of Service Research, 5(4), 303–315.
  6. [6]Efron, B., & Morris, C. (1975). Data analysis using Stein’s estimator and its generalizations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(350), 311–319.
  7. [7]Rhoades, S. A. (1993). The Herfindahl–Hirschman index. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 79, 188–189.
  8. [8]Cleveland, R. B., Cleveland, W. S., McRae, J. E., & Terpenning, I. (1990). STL: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. Journal of Official Statistics, 6(1), 3–73.
  9. [9]Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861–874.
  10. [10]Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall.
  11. [11]Lewis, R. A., & Rao, J. M. (2015). The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 1941–1973.

Cite as

MediaLabs Research, in collaboration with Coherence Limited (2026). What sells in Textiles & Soft Furnishings on TikTok Shop: higher-priced products, voice-over videos and a growing category. ContentIQ Working Paper CIQ-WP-2026-24, version 1. https://medialabs-co.com/research/category-textiles-and-soft-furnishings

Download PDF

Analysis and data: Coherence Research, Coherence ContentIQ. Published by MediaLabs in collaboration with Coherence Limited.

Version history

  • Version 11 Oct 2026This version

Turn this research into your TikTok Shop plan.

MediaLabs runs TikTok Shop for 150+ brand programs. Book a 30-min strategy call and we’ll show you what these findings mean for your category.

Book a Strategy Call